JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 24, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Harold Eduardo Sua Montaña

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por incumplimiento de carga argumentativa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena procedió a levantar la suspensión de términos en el proceso de la referencia y a resolver las solicitudes de nulidad formuladas en contra de los Autos 044/21 y 515/21.

Luego de revisar los argumentos del peticionario, la Corte decidió NEGAR las solicitudes de nulidad formuladas por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montaña, por no cumplir con el requisito de carga argumentativa.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos en el expediente de la referencia, decretada mediante Auto 044 de 2021, y ORDERNAR a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que realice las anotaciones correspondientes.
  2. SEGUNDO. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad formulada por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana contra el
  3. cuarto. resolutivo del Auto 044 de 2021 y ADVERTIRLE que contra esta decision no procede recurso.
  4. TERCERO. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad formulada por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana contra el Auto 515 de 2021 y ADVERTIRLE que contra esta decision no procede recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.